Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a230f8269adbcf66

Jump to content

Talk:Star-mesh transform

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Nanite in topic Incomplete article

Impedance formula

[edit]

It looks like the the formula for impedance given in the article is based off of an equation for conductance in "Planarization by Transformation" (van Lier and Otten, 1973). In a DC circuit, however, conductance is equivalent to admittance - the reciprocal of impedance. I've swapped each impedance value with its reciprocal. This new equation matches the equations for impedance given in Y-Δ_transform#Equations_for_the_transformation_from_Y-load_to_.CE.94-load_3-phase_circuit for the case where the star vertex is degree 3.

Please let me know if my edit was in error, or if a better formatting for the equation would be preferred.

Morganfshirley (talk) 21:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've changed the equation to be clearer by inverting the denominator. The equation originally appeared as I have it now. Whoever changed it before you did apparently didn't know that: . Or they were trying to do the reverse transform.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.193.200.217 (talk) 23:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Solver Tool

[edit]

Here is an online tool that simplifies a network by repeatedly applying the star-mesh transform: https://kirill-kryukov.com/electronics/resistor-network-solver/ . It also explains the process step by step. Should it be mentioned in the article?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.102.46.79 (talk) 15:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Incomplete article

[edit]

This article is woefully incomplete in that it shows us a single example but makes no attempt to say how the transform works in general. Is it applied ONLY to "stars"? If so, the article should say so. And the specifics of the application of the Schur complement could also be included. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article is somewhat poorly phrased. The clarifications I'd recommend: 1) The removed node needs to be fully internal. This should be mentioned in the lead paragraph! 2) Even in a complicated non-star circuit, every node is locally a 'star' with respect to its nearest neighbours, and the transform replaces that node with a full coupling. 3) Any terminal can be made into an internal node by deciding to leave that terminal unconnected to the external circuit; in that case the star-mesh transform can be used to calculate response of the reduced-terminal-count device. --Nanite (talk) 16:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply