Talk:Stanene
Add topicLatest comment: 12 years ago by Rod57 in topic Too soon...
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 December 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Name
[edit]The following is the source of the name "Stanene": • Sbmeirow • Talk • 21:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Too soon...
[edit]A single theory PRL is pretty weak sourcing for a stand alone article. I would suggest we wait until someone actually manages to grow a film... a13ean (talk) 05:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- I would note that all other sources are either reprints or closely based on the press release. a13ean (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Disagree. It's convenient to gather all info/speculation on stanene in one place rather than bury it in multiple other articles such as tin or topological insulators. Rod57 (talk) 23:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Even Scientific American noted it : "Could Atomically Thin Tin Transform Electronics? " - Rod57 (talk) 23:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)