Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a243c1594e135645

Jump to content

Talk:Standard Time Act

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Int21h in topic Idaho
[edit]

Still looking.. 「ѕʀʟ·18:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

That would be the United States Statutes at Large, of which the relevant volume and page ("40 Stat. 450", volume 40, page 450) is on Wikisource but has not been transliterated and proofread. Other than that, if you can read English from old-fashioned dead trees, you should be good to go. Int21h (talk) 07:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

There are several sources available at this time including http://legisworks.org/sal/40/stats/STATUTE-40-Pg450b.pdf and https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/65th-congress/session-2/c65s2ch24.pdf PolychromePlatypus 21:48, 27 April 2018 (UTC)  Preceding unsigned comment added by PolychromePlatypus (talkcontribs)

Idaho

[edit]

Section 264 of the act mistakenly placed most of the state of Idaho (south of Salmon River (Idaho)) in UTC−06:00 CST Central Standard Time, but was amended in 2007 by Congress to UTC−07:00 MST Mountain Standard Time.[2] MST was observed prior to the correction. The Standard Time Act itself (http://legisworks.org/sal/40/stats/STATUTE-40-Pg450b.pdf) only had 5 sections and did not define time zones, so which act is being referred to here? XinaNicole (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

They're probably referring to 15 U.S.C. § 264. The history for that section shows it was added by 42 Stat. 1434 (1923), and it was amended by 62 Stat. 646 (1948) and 121 Stat. 599 (2007). The reference given does not support the above statement, though. Int21h (talk) 19:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply