Talk:Stalin (Scheme implementation)
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stalin (Scheme implementation) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Why is it called Stalin? 128.54.150.134 (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Due to its brutality. Barak (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
because the author think stalin use is funny. For that kind of "jokes" lovers I suggest him (jew i think) name it Hitler. Or hitler isnt so funny? The author is an asshole. 77.52.154.115 (talk) 23:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)2jerk
It is open source, so you can fork stalin and call your version "hitler" if you wish. As to why the name "stalin" is funnier than "hitler", I'd put it down to the big bushy mustache. Barak (talk) 19:54, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
What?
[edit]On a number of tests it has outperformed hand-written C, sometimes by a considerable margin.
Subjective much?
Full R4RS Scheme is supported, with a few minor and rarely-encountered omissions
As long as it's full R4RS, I'll settle with omissions.
-_- Paxcoder (talk) 13:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)