Talk:Squander
Add topicLatest comment: 20 years ago by JamesMLane in topic BoardGameGeek link
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
BoardGameGeek link
[edit]I think this is a reasonable external link. It has information about the subject of the article, but in more detail than we'd put in the article -- a reproduction of the game box cover, and links to BoardGameGeek files of rules and component list. For that reason, I'm restoring it (with a tightened description). JamesMLane 16:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- This comes up all the time - see Talk:BoardGameGeek. Some days I wonder whether we need a bot to patrol this. Percy Snoodle 12:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- The trouble with assigning it to a bot is that circumstances alter cases. Squander is more than 40 years old. There isn't a lot of readily available information about it, especially compared with more recent or contemporary games. JamesMLane t c 13:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)