Talk:Squamacula
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Hemiauchenia in topic Scope change
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scope change
[edit]It's highly unusual for extinct species to get their own articles, and especially obscure ones definitely should not because there would be too much overlap and repetition between the genus and species articles. Since Squamacula doesn't exist, why not create a genus article instead and include S. buckorum? User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 14:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Dunkleosteus77: Done. Also improved Artiopoda, the clade widely recognised and used, do you have any ideas for improvement? Hemiauchenia (talk) 13:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/12 February 2020
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Stub-Class Arthropods articles
- Low-importance Arthropods articles
- WikiProject Arthropods articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
