Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a225af678939cfc3

Jump to content

Talk:Spectral space

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Marcus0107 in topic T0 needed?

Omega

[edit]

It is not clear what Omega is. Is it the topology of X? --MarSch 28 June 2005 16:52 (UTC)

There's no omega any more. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 17:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Spectral theory

[edit]

Could anybody explain the relationship (if a natural one exists) between spectral spaces and spectral theory? 128.62.97.227 19:13, 25 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

There is none, in the ordinary, canonical sense. With a slight stretch of the definition of "related", see the section "Functional analysis perspective" of the article spectrum of a ring -- the eigenvectors are the "points" of the topology, from which you can then form ideals, and so on, and in fact, have a fair amount of overlap with operator theory. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 17:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

T0 needed?

[edit]

Any sober space is T0, so there should be no need to require this latter condition. fudo (questions?) 13:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Indeed. -- xmath (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Some authors call a space sober if it is the closure of a point. To avoid confusion, the T0 property should be stated explicitly.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcus0107 (talkcontribs) 23:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge with coherent space

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was not merged D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:55, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

There already is an article about Coherent spaces, which are the same thing. They should probably be merged. -- xmath (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

No. Spectral spaces have a completely different use than coherent spaces. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.132.91 (talk) 06:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The pages should not be merged. Spectral spaces occur in a wide variety of areas in mathematics and are the standard terminology now. Coherent spaces are spectral spaces when viewed in a particular context of topology. (Marcus0107 (talk) 09:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC))Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.