Talk:Specification-driven development

RSes on the subject?

This was largely sourced to marketing blogs. One claim about LLMs purported to be cited to a conference paper from 2004.

How are the solid RSes on SDD? - David Gerard (talk) 12:39, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

For the lead InfoQ does not seem ideal, here, but I found one additional RS we could use:

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950584920302457

It also appears that reliable sources use the term "specification-driven development" more often than "spec-driven development." in both the paper I mentioned and the Springer paper already in the page. We may want to consider renaming to match sourcing. ◦ Sibshops (talk) 18:14, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Fine by me - David Gerard (talk) 09:33, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Okay, done. I replaced the unreliable sources with another reliable one and moved the page to match usage in these sources. ◦ Sibshops (talk) 13:51, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

AI

basis of AI-led SDLC , different than vibecoding It'd be good to cover. ~2026-38073-05 (talk) 19:40, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Do you have any independent secondary sources supporting inclusion? The links to the blog posts provided are generally not considered reliable sources. ◦ Sibshops (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

yeah, but those are blog posts from leading researches/experts in the field on blogs adjacent to big corporations like Amazon (published white paper) etc.. It's about techical stuff not product propaganda. It seems to me that's more reliable than an article from Idk let's say "wired" on the topic. Regarding all that, I am of the opinion it passes the requirements. It's the practice of big companies to publish techical stuff on adjacent blogs, and they leave marketing, product announcements etc on the main site. ~2026-38073-05 (talk) 05:52, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

The issue is not the the companies or authors are more knowledgeable. The concern is if the material is independent of the subject, so wikipedia in general does not use vendor or corporate blogs as reliable sources. ◦ Sibshops (talk) 15:59, 4 July 2026 (UTC)