Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Pigsonthewing, according to the article, Sparodon is a monotypic genus. I do not know if a species has recently been assigned or something similar, but if it is not, the article of the genus should be redirected here. This is one of the Wikipedia policies as you can see here. SuperΨDro11:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
(edit conflict) I agree that this should be moved to Sparodon and have Sparodon durbanensis redirected to the article. With Super Dromaeosaurus's last edit to the article, all the information on that page is now covered here. I don't really see the point of having a separate article. Also, as Super Dromaeosaurus said, WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA encourages this in almost all circumstances, and I don't see why this would be an exceptional circumstance.--SkyGazer 512Oh no, what did I do this time?16:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
