Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a1c8ac9ad5ad68

Jump to content

Talk:Spades (suit)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Bermicourt in topic Inconsistent importance

Meanings in other languages

[edit]

I think the section Spades (suit)#Meanings in other languages is a largely irrelevant list. This is not a dictionnary. A short statement of the fact that the name of the suit in most langauges have such and such meanings, with notable examples and exceptions, would be better. Likewise for the other suits

In fact, this info might be better summarized in Suit (cards)#Traditional Western playing cards, with a suitable link from each suit.--Noe (talk) 12:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Conflict

[edit]

The line:

"It is often stated that the suit is named after Spanish espada (sword), but this is not likely. In Germany and Scandinavia, Spanish playing cards were not in use, and Spanish loanwords in these languages were rare. It should also be noted that the Spanish name for the French suit is picas - not espadas."

(5th part of the opener)

conflicts with this line in Suit (cards):

"The Italian-style suits are the original suits (which is why the English term 'spade' refers not to the tool, but is derived from the Italian word espada = "sword", which this suit represents)"

(#1 of the second set of bullets in the "Traditional Eastern suits and decks" section)

Neither one is cited.

Anyone have a source, can correct this conflict, know the answer" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.34.219 (talk) 06:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistent importance

[edit]
  • Talk:Clubs (suit) says "This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale"
  • Talk:Hearts (suit) says "This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale"
  • Talk:Diamonds (suit) says "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale"

This seems odd since, as I recall in bridge, their "order of importance" in auctions was clubs, diamonds, hearts, spades.

I'll leave it up to an expert to decide the importance of spades. wbm1058 (talk) 11:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing that out; I've reclassified them all as mid-importance. Suit orders within card games vary e.g. in Skat and most central European games it's Clubs, Spades, Hearts and Diamonds. But "importance" here is within the overall subject of board and table games and I reckon card suits are significant enough to raise above the minimum level. Bermicourt (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply