Talk:Sovintern

Labour

Prensa Latina says:

Entre los cofundadores se encuentran el Partido Laborista Británico

Is this the Labour Party (UK), the Workers Party of Britain or another? --Error (talk) 10:55, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

The latter Holden3172 (talk) 21:59, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

There should be no deletion.

There enough sources that can be found that confirms Sovintern Existence and notability, Sovintern was a that held speeches from popular and notable figures, so this deletion seems more targeted at the fact, they likely despise the organization or some Political figures who took part, I recommend to continue to article and further develop as time progresses. Andy Florida (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

the deletion discussion can be found here, its not on the talk page of the article being AfD'd Syndilinke (talk) 19:11, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Union of Democratic Socialists

Is the Union of Democratic Socialists of Congo the Union for Democracy and Social Progress? -- Error (talk) 22:50, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

the linked source calls the congo section "Union of Democratic Socialists", likely a party that doesn't meet WP:N so lacks a page Syndilinke (talk) 14:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

"Left-wing"

The article repeatedly states this is a left-wing movement, but most if not all of the participants are in fact nazbols, a far-right ideology that uses leftist imagery and terminology to make itself look more appealing, similarly to why the Nazis called themselves "National Socialists" Scrabcrab (talk) 23:21, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

if the parties call themselves that, then add it to the list but if its your opinion or WP:OR then i'd avoid adding it if i was you Syndilinke (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Trimming the infobox ideologies

Including every ideology of individual participants in the infobox as representing the whole international is WP:OR. The ideology section should include only ideologies that reliable sources attribute to the international as a whole. Alternatively, if reliable secondary sources describe ideological factions within the international, those may be included. Without such sources, this constitutes WP:OR and may in some cases be WP:UNDUE. If the inclusion of ideological labels raises concerns under WP:OR and WP:UNDUE, the ideology section in the infobox could be removed altogether. The existing purpose statement "International coordination of socialist and left-wing political parties and movements" already provides a sufficient description of the organization for the infobox. ~2026-32470-76 (talk) 16:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

I agree, unless reliable sources are found for this part of the infobox, it should be removed. Slodkiszczur (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Notable people section

In the article, I saw a section on notable people. However, some criteria should be included, as I understand that on Wikipedia, notability is generally established when a person has their own article or when notability is recognized by reliable sources. ~2026-32470-76 (talk) 16:59, 31 May 2026 (UTC)