Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a240880c2d4cae97

Jump to content

Talk:Solar apex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Johnjbarton in topic History

Coordinates

[edit]

This cites what appear to be precise-coordinate conversions of imprecise coordinates that would indicate a rather rough determination. If so, good science demands that this be made clear. 74.69.160.254 (talk) 17:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

WP:SYNTH or original research?

[edit]

There does not seem to be any reliable reference for "solar apex". The only paper that mentions the term is the 1980 Hoskin, Michael paper.

The article should have a source for the definition (Hoskin would work) and the direction. As it is we have some editors making claims by combining data from sources: that is synthesis right? Johnjbarton (talk) 20:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Done Johnjbarton (talk) 23:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Location

[edit]

According to your star map, the little dot is in Lyra, and much closer to the main part of Lyra than to the main part of Hercules. The maps are much easier to read with "invert color", that is: white sky with black stars. That is the most common way that star maps are published. You should also provide that type so that viewers do not have to do their own conversions. Viewers that need to print the maps need to have the white sky versions. If you feel that only one type should be here, then get rid of the black sky/white star versions. agb 173.233.167.51 (talk) 18:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

History

[edit]

There must be an interesting history of the concept. What observations lead Herschel to conclude that there was a phenomenon? I don't think that there was capability to observe spectral shifts as indicating motion. And wasn't it assumed that the Sun was motionless, so that the stars were streaming past the Sun? And then it was some evolution of the understanding of the structure of the Milky Way, and the Solar Systems' place and motion in it. 06:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC) TomS TDotO (talk) 06:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

According to the Hoskin ref cited in the article:
  • Throughout the eighteenth century astronomers and cosmological speculators considered the possibility that the Sun and the solar system are moving through space
I added some content about Herschel's work. He had tables of star motions to work from. I believe the basic assumption was "fixed stars" so changed would be attributed to solar motion. Johnjbarton (talk) 02:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply