Talk:Snyk

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional. To be honest, I'm not sure which part of it could be construed as promotional. What was written was done so in an encyclopedic manner. If you could point out what is promotional, will adjust the language accordingly. Thank you --MaskedSinger (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Startup?

Started in 2015. We are almost at the end of 2021. If it hasn't started up by now then it has failed. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

A company valued at $8.5 billion is not a Startup any more, it is a very successful company. It is awkward that there is no article about this company in Wikipedia. דוד שי (talk) 11:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Never assume good faith

After trying to edit this draft I believe that the nice rule "Assume good faith" was changed into "Never assume good faith" as far as people outside Wikipedia are concerned. I learned that an announcement by a company about acquisition of another company is not enough. Why? Is every company a liar by default? I tried to bring Crunchbase as a reference, but it was denied by some filter. דוד שי (talk) 11:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

@דוד שי Please try not to be silly about this, and do not introduce faux-references.

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

I am sure that a software company valued at $8.5 billion is suitable for an article in the English Wikipedia. If the rules prevent it, something is wrong in the rules. דוד שי (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

A company's value has no bearing on it's notability. Theroadislong (talk) 12:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

@דוד שי If you believe it to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) please do the work to prove it. Arguing the toss will not achieve anything. Proving it with excellence of referencing will.

You have the opportunity to argue for policy changes. Your voice carries as much weight as does any other editor's. Please express arguments for your desired change at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Speaking about it on this draft's talk page will achieve nothing at all Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 14:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Acceptance at AFC

In my view this was borderline to accept. Rather than allowing it to languish and eventually fall foul of G13 I chose to accept it and allow the community to reach a conclusion. I view some of the referencing to need replacement or excision Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Is this the acquirer of Snyk Code?

See, currently, Draft:Snyk Code. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

This is a confused draft. "Snyk Code" is the result of the acquisition of DeepCode. Loew Galitz (talk) 03:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Notability

The page has plenty of refs, but they are routine business coverage. Here we need sources satisfying WP:NORG. --Altenmann >talk 19:15, 12 March 2026 (UTC)