Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21e58d9187a15db

Jump to content

Talk:Smooth maximum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 45.181.122.234 in topic Another possible approximation

this page needs good references to generalized mean, theoretical & implementation details, uses and possible links back to the softmax function. So far only John Cook's blog posts seem to be useful, http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/01/13/soft-maximum/. He does however use a different function that converges in the limit and call the topic soft maximum.

definition according to who?

[edit]

The article gives a definition of a smooth maximum in general - a category of functions that must fulfil some criteria - but does not say who gave this definition, or who uses it, or why this definition might exist. Is it real? Is there supporting literature?--mcld (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

LogSumExp

[edit]

The article claims that LogSumExp is a smooth maximum, but this is a category error, since we have defined a smooth maximum to be a *family* of functions, rather than a single function. There is no discussion on how we can parameterize LogSumExp to get a better approximation to the maximum function.  J.Gowers  12:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Another possible approximation

[edit]

I think it could be approximated by different functions for like:

Notice it has different signs than the Boltzmann approximation.

I believe is interesting since I have never seen before the approximation for splitting the logarith of a sum before finding it accidentally here {https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4838311/909869}. Maybe a superuser could incorporate it after checking it do works as intended. 45.181.122.234 (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply