Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Small Time Crooks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Agreed...although Woody's never mentioned the debt to the earlier film (as far as I know), the plots of Larceny Inc and this movie are way too similar to have been coincidental —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.228.159 (talk • contribs) 03:27, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
The cite currently used to support this in the article doesn't seem properly referenced; "Robert Osborne of Turner Classic Movies on June 15, 2006" -where did he say it, what precisely was it he said? Is there any way to confirm these? If it's not reproducible or able to be confirmed it doesn't seem like it's got much worth as a citation. Reading the plots of both they don't seem that similar, aside from a couple of plot points, but then there are also large divergences.219.88.68.195 (talk) 21:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
