Talk:Smack You
Add topic| Smack You has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 20, 2026. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Dr. Dre dissuaded Eminem from releasing a diss track aimed at Suge Knight? | ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment
[edit]@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, thank you for assessing the article. Could you clarify what made you go with Start-class? Looking at WP:CCLASS or even WP:BCLASS, I am not seeing which part of the criteria is not met. The article is fully referenced with no major gaps in its coverage; it is organized into clearly defined sections with the lead summarizing every important detail; there are no significant grammar issues as far as I can tell as a non-native speaker, nor any MOS violations; images are included where appropriate; and there's no unnecessarily complex terminology. Infoboxes are not required, and I chose not to include one as I figured it'd be too incomplete to be useful (no songwriting credits, producers, labels, etc. since this is an unreleased track). Cheers, TeoTB (talk) 20:26, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- I tend to be conservative on assessments, and I rarely give anything a B because it requires a review of the sources. I'm comfortable re-assessing this one as C-class. I really wouldn't be too concerned about subjective ratings until/unless you are shooting for GA status. Thanks and happy editing. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- C-class is fair, thanks. TeoTB (talk) 16:59, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Smack You/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: RTSthestardust (talk · contribs) 23:18, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 06:56, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Shall review. Arconning (talk) 06:56, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- @RTSthestardust Here shall be my review. Arconning (talk) 16:01, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Everything is fixed. RTSthestardust (talk) 16:30, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Prose and MoS
[edit]Lead and infobox
[edit]- "American rapper Eminem", could say "American rapper and record executive Eminem" to clarify "signee"
- " for associating with Suge Knight", you can omit "Suge" as the full name was mentioned previously in the lead.
- Wikilink FBI.
- "connection with the January leaks.", no need to say the month as it was mentioned previously + it gets a bit puffy if you include the month unless it's an agreed upon term.
Background and leak
[edit]- Could wikilink Demo (music)
- Wikilink FBI.
Composition
[edit]- "to blame Suge Knight for the murders", same as second comment as it was mentioned previously in the body.
Reception and response
[edit]- "he denied his father's rumored involvement in Tupac Shakur's death", you can use "Shakur" rather than his full name as it was mentioned previously within the body.
Images and audio
[edit]- All of the images and audio clip used are relevant to the article and are under relevant licensing. All good here.
References
[edit]- Earwig checks out alright.
- Reference checks: 1, 2, 6, 15, 16. All good here.
Miscellaneous
[edit]- No ongoing edit war, broad enough information, neutral.
- "List of murdered hip-hop musicians", you could remove this.
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 05:20, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- ... that Dr. Dre dissuaded Eminem from releasing a diss track aimed at Suge Knight?
- Source: [1]
- ALT1: ... that a 2003 Eminem diss track aimed at Suge Knight and Ja Rule was leaked more than two decades later by an audio engineer? Source: [2]
- ALT2: ... that Eminem's diss track "Smack You" samples a phrase a Tupac Shakur song interpreted as saying "Suge shot me"? Source: [1]
- Reviewed:
RTSthestardust (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC).
All good on this end. Note that I removed two unfitting commas from ALT2. I like ALT0 and ALT1 better regardless. IceWelder [✉] 15:49, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'm especially a fan of ALT0. Additionally, for QPQ, I passed EarthBound Halloween Hack. - RTSthestardust (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
References
- 1 2 Schäfers, Leon (January 14, 2025). "Der junge Eminem in Bestform: Disstrack aus den 2000ern geleakt". Hiphop.de (in German). Archived from the original on August 23, 2025. Retrieved July 23, 2025.
- ↑ McCollum, Brian (March 19, 2025). "Former Eminem Studio Employee Charged by FBI After Online Leak of Unreleased Songs". Detroit Free Press. Archived from the original on March 22, 2025. Retrieved August 9, 2025.
Audio track
[edit]This was overlooked by the GAN, but non-free files are not decoratives and need a contextual presentation. File:Eminem - Smack You.ogg needs to be explained anywhere in the article, possible at the reception. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 23:14, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- FYI I've nominated the file for deletion per WP:NFCCP#4. TeoTB (talk) 14:06, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
"unreleased"
[edit]In a couple of places we refer to the track as "unreleased", can we accurately say this given that it leaked? Should we perhaps replace "unreleased" with "leaked"? TarnishedPathtalk 10:18, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- I think it's standard practice to refer to such tracks as unreleased. There's various examples of leaked tracks in Category:Unreleased songs: Pissy Pamper, New Body, Watch This (Lil Uzi Vert song). These are also described as unreleased in prose.
- Here's also a couple excerpts from the sources cited in this article:
- XXL:
On Monday (Jan. 13), an unreleased Eminem diss track made its rounds online. The song is titled "Smack You"
[1] - AllHipHop:
Eminem fans are losing it following a spate of recent leaks from the rapper’s unreleased catalog, including an incendiary two decades old diss targeting Suge Knight and Ja Rule, titled, “Smack You,”
[2]
- XXL:
- TeoTB (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- But it is released, whether that release was authorised or not. TarnishedPathtalk 12:47, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- Is a leak considered a release though? To me personally, a release, at least in the context of music, implies an official, authorized action. So when a song is described as unreleased, what this communicates is that it has not been officially made available; it may well have leaked. I think this interpretation is fairly common (see the articles I linked above), but who knows. Maybe this would be a good topic to discuss with WikiProject Songs? If there's consensus that describing a leaked song as simply "unreleased" is not preferred or is misleading, we'd have to edit quite a few articles. Of course, the fix would be quite simple:
"Smack You" is a diss track by American rapper Eminem aimed at Ja Rule and Suge Knight. Recorded c. 2003, it has never been officially released; it leaked online on January 13, 2025 ...
TeoTB (talk) 13:50, 16 May 2026 (UTC)- Looks good for me. I'm not looking to change any existing consensus, to me it just didn't gel with my understanding of the usage of the language. TarnishedPathtalk 13:52, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- I think either phrasing works, so I've gone ahead and edited the article. TeoTB (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- Looks good for me. I'm not looking to change any existing consensus, to me it just didn't gel with my understanding of the usage of the language. TarnishedPathtalk 13:52, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- Is a leak considered a release though? To me personally, a release, at least in the context of music, implies an official, authorized action. So when a song is described as unreleased, what this communicates is that it has not been officially made available; it may well have leaked. I think this interpretation is fairly common (see the articles I linked above), but who knows. Maybe this would be a good topic to discuss with WikiProject Songs? If there's consensus that describing a leaked song as simply "unreleased" is not preferred or is misleading, we'd have to edit quite a few articles. Of course, the fix would be quite simple:
- But it is released, whether that release was authorised or not. TarnishedPathtalk 12:47, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
References
- ↑ Coleman II, C. Vernon (January 14, 2025). "New Eminem Song Leak Includes Ja Rule Diss and Suge Knight Murder Accusations". XXL. Archived from the original on August 5, 2025. Retrieved July 22, 2025.
- ↑ Jennn, London (January 14, 2025). "Eminem Blames Suge Knight for 2Pac & Biggie's Deaths in Leaked Diss". AllHipHop. Archived from the original on February 7, 2025. Retrieved July 24, 2025.