Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22d9c03399f48fc

Jump to content

Talk:Sleep surgery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Moribundum in topic Hypoglossal nerve stimulator implant

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ssledd1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Remove OSA explanation

[edit]

I feel that a whole section describing OSA is unnecessary. I believe a short explanation in the introduction, plus a simple wikilink would suffice. Any comment before I remove this section? Attaboy (talk) 19:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Radio Frequency Ablation?

[edit]

Radio Frequency Ablation has been used (especially at the base of the tongue) for over 10 years now. Isn't there any information on that?Gstridsigne (talk) 08:38, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hypoglossal nerve stimulator implant

[edit]

Should there be a section on hypoglossal nerve stimulator implants? Prophylax (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Done although content may need some work Moribundum (talk) 07:02, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Recategorizing procedure based on anatomy

[edit]

Should the different types of surgeries be classified based on anatomical location of obstruction (eg, nasal cavity, oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx)? Prophylax (talk) 20:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Replying to old comment. That would be a good idea. Nasal, palatal, pharyngeal for example. Moribundum (talk) 07:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: MEDU 9320-WikiProject Medical Translation-Spanish

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 November 2024 and 15 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jeffdmed (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jeffdmed (talk) 20:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ablation

[edit]

The article has

The targeted tissue, such as tongue or palate, is usually approached through the mouth without the need for incisions, although occasionally the target is approached through the neck using assisted imaging

sourced to doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.11.013. Maybe I'm missing something but I'm not seeing how the source WP:verifies the text. Pinging Moribundum, who added it. Bon courage (talk) 04:05, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I merged content from other articles (Snoring, Obstructive sleep apnea) to this article. The main reason for this was that surgical procedures for all sleep related breathing disorders appear to be the same. I did a 90% rewrite on snoring and concluded there was no point in duplicating surgical content when essentially the same content would be covered on OSA. Then I found this sleep surgery article and thought it would be better to do a summary style by merging surgical content from OSA and leaving a minimal summary section on OSA with a link to this article.
I did not check the references thoroughly but I can see there is unsupported content, primary sources, unsuitable sources, and some tone issues. I often find "advertising" tone on surgical content (the sentence you pasted above has borderline advertising tone). I'm hoping to work further on this article and the sub articles of some of the individual procedures (as alluded to in these edit summaries when I merged some content here ). It is likely the article will need extensive work... better refs and complete re-write. If any other editor wants to do some of that work, that would be very helpful. Regards, Moribundum (talk) 06:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply