Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23aaa47dd551ec6

Jump to content

Talk:Skylab II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Rod57 in topic Why not pursued

Usefulness at L2?

[edit]

As I understand it, at the L2 point, the station would constantly stay above the far side of the Moon (180 deg. longitude), so it would be constantly out of touch with the Earth, unless a network of lunar communications satellites could be figured out. And would such satellites disturb the stability of the Lagrangian point? JustinTime55 (talk) 21:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Discussing the feasibility of a proposal is probably off-topic for a talk page, but... The L2 point isn't gravitationally stable. A facility "at L2" would actually need to "orbit" around the actual L2 point. Hence should be visible to at least GEO satellites as relays. Try Lissajous orbit and Lagrangian_point#Stability -- 118.210.193.19 (talk) 15:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Date it was proposed

[edit]

I assume this was first proposed some time in 2013. Shouldn't that be in the introduction? -- 118.210.193.19 (talk) 14:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Why not pursued

[edit]

What criticism was made of this proposal, or why was it not proceeded with ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply