Talk:Sky Scrapper

GA Nomination

@Themeparkgc: I've added one review and a quick mention about the coaster never appearing in any polls. I spent nearly an hour searching through google (including the Chinese one which brought up SOME different results but nothing special). I'd say nominate this article and if the reviewer asks about reviews, just say that the only other "semi-review" is what enthusiasts thought of the roller coaster by just watching a POV (see TPR's forum about World Joyland).--Dom497 (talk) 16:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

I'll take a shot. Themeparkgc  Talk  22:51, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sky Scrapper/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC) Review coming soon. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC) This article passes, however there are two points I wish to address. The first being that, pertaining to the comments made on the article talk page, there is no need for further reviews. Articles are pursuant to the GA criterion, not the Operation B&M template. Secondly, this park is not necessarily unlicensed. Clearly, inspiration is drawn from the WoW franchise, but the resort complex does not utilize the franchise's brands, rather it utilizes derived contrivances, for example, theme park is divided into two separate parks, one being "Universe of Starship" (derived from Starcraft), the other "Terrain of Magic" (once again, derived, but not stolen). It is important to understand derivation is separate from plagiarism. See this source: (World Joyland)