Talk:Skate Kitchen

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Skate Kitchen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk · contribs) 11:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

I will review this soon.___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk (We are the champions, my friends) 11:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments

• Add Category:Directorial debut films
• Can the cast section be referenced
• Add {{div col}} in the cast section. I.e. {{div col}} * a *b *c {{div col end}}

Other then that I don't see any problems with the promotion.___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk (We are the champions, my friends) 12:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Thanks. I haven't added the category because this film was not her debut (I've removed that part from the lead) – it was the director's first narrative film, but she previously directed a feature-length documentary. I added a reference only to the end of the cast section because it seems unnecessary to cite every bullet point to the same reference. Let me know if you have anything else to add. 97198 (talk) 10:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: