Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
I haven't changed it myself because I don't know what the source said. If it's a paraphrase, we should go with anthropocentrism. If it's the term used, then I think we might want a better source, or put quotes on that word, or something. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books}12:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
The source says: "The notion that bacteria are primitive, unsophisticated organisms stems from what I would call size chauvinism". I can't find a source that uses "size anthropocentrism" at all (or "size bias" in a relevant way). bd2412T16:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What is misleading with this phrase? Is "big" being indicated the reference point as concerns largeness? Because smallness can also be a reason for identifying the inexact meaning of "size". Big is not a neutral term. It indicates how much larger is one object to another. That statement is inconsistent if one is searching to distinguish how small is one object from another. It seams the logic involved in the original statement is misconstrued intention. We might as well be using the term "muchness".2605:E000:9149:A600:3832:5234:5BA4:7DB6 (talk) 00:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale..jpg){kind=small}
