Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22b0333cf69d806

Jump to content

Talk:Siston

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by CaroleHenson in topic Material unable to substantiate

Domesday book

[edit]

Is this the book used:

  • Caroline Thorn, Frank Thorn (ed.) and John Morris (gen. editor) (1985) Domesday Book: Devon. '9 Devon, Parts 1 & 2. Chichester: Phillimore Press. Bk. i. 168 ai

for: "Domesday Bk. i. 168ai"?

If it is, it's commented out in the article, the comment format just needs to be removed.--CaroleHenson (talk) 14:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

WP:SPLIT notification

[edit]

Cecil papers

[edit]

Please verify if these are the correct citations:

  • from a letter summarised in the Cecil Papers<ref>''[http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=112381 ''Cecil Papers: Miscellaneous 1607, Calendar of the Cecil Papers in Hatfield House, 16-30]'', Calendar of the Cecil Papers in Hatfield House. '''19''': (1965) [1607], pp. 433 (124.72) Retrieved 8 July 2013. <!--- inserted source info for: Cecil Papers. vol 19, p.433. (124.72){{full|1-source info - publisher or repository|date=July 2013}}---></ref>
  • <ref>''[http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=112380&strquery="Sir Morris Dennis" Cecil Papers: December 1607, 16-30]'', Calendar of the Cecil Papers in Hatfield House. '''19''': (1965) [1607], p.374 (123.113) Retrieved 8 July 2013. <!--- inserted source info for: p.374 (123.113){{full|1-source info - publisher or repository|date=July 2013}}--></ref>

And, please provide a bit more information to determine the source info from http://www.british-history.ac.uk/ or another source for

  • <ref>Cecil Papers. vol 24. 6/5/1609. Re Billingsley's claim.{{full|1-source info - publisher or repository|date=July 2013}}</ref>

Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Material unable to substantiate

[edit]

Here's a summary of the information I'm unable to substantiate and/or it's not on target with the article subject:

If I have moved anything here that should be returned to the article because it 1) is directly related to the subject (village of Siston) and 2) has reliable, published source, please respond.--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:00, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

References

Lead font

[edit]

I have left a "Citation needed" template up for the information in the "Baptismal font" section because I have found sources that I've not been able to access that discuss the Siston church's lead font. Is there a source for the following:

"The Siston font displays 6 figures, three of which seem to be of Christ, as a nimbus is shown. The other three may be some of the Four Evangelists, who hold their own gospels and bless with two fingers of their right hands. It appears that the prototype of this font, as the finer versions show, had 12 figures, possibly the Twelve Apostles. There are 12 niches shown on the Siston font, but six are filled with acanthus scroll-work."

Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 19:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Split: Denys family of Siston

[edit]