Talk:Sisimiut/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ·Maunus·ƛ· 21:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article over the next week or so. I have had a breif look and am very optimistic - it doesn't look like it has any major problems.·Maunus·ƛ· 21:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Review

1.Well-written:

a.the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; Agree

b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Agree

2.Factually accurate and verifiable:

a. it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout; Agree

b. it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged Agree

c.it contains no original research. Agree

3. Broad in its coverage:

a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic Agree

b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Agree

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias. Agree 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Agree 6. Illustrated, if possible, by images Agree

a. images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; Agree

b. images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Agree

Comment: I congratulate the editors who wrote this article - it is obviously the result of a very good team work. I can see no serious problems at all and the only thing I need to check before passing the article is the copyright status of the images. This looks very good.·Maunus·ƛ· 00:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I've checked image copyright and didn't detect any problems. I'll pass the article.·Maunus·ƛ· 21:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Thankyou Maunus. I only hope Algkalv will return soon so we collaborate on some more articles.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)