Talk:Single-cable distribution

NPOV dispute

I have removed the NPOV message because it is not backed up with any arguments or explanation whatsoever. In what way does this article read as an advert? What is it supposed to be advertising? For the record, two months ago I changed the article because it was then a bit of an advert, by changing the title from “Unicable” (a trade name) to “Single Cable Distribution” (the generic term for the technology used by the standards organisation, CENELEC and others), by expanding the text from mere lifts from brochures to (I think) more useful explanations, and by adding citations from various sources. If anyone does believe that this article is biased and reads like an advert, by all means reinstate the NPOV dispute, but please make it a dispute, with arguments that can be addressed, and not a fait accompli. Thank you. Satbuff (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)