Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a243ac1a2975f54b

Jump to content

Talk:Sindoor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by 獅眠洞 in topic Work needs to be done

Untitled

[edit]

"The bindi is mere beautification, like the velvet patches or beauty-spots worn by well-dressed European women in the 18th century."

This is VERY inaccurate. The bindi is worn by Hindu women for religion not beauty.

No, it is accurate. sindoor is worn by Hindu women for relgion and bindis for beauty.

nope if anything it is the opposite. sindooram is incredibly religious.

Work needs to be done

[edit]

This sindoor custom is intriguing and deserves a better article. Surprised it is so weak. Muslim women have a variant of it too (not with sindoor though). --Hunnjazal (talk) 09:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sources
  1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bareilly/this-muslim-couple-prefers-saffron-kurtas-sindur-seminary-approves-with-fatwa/articleshow/61136410.cms
  2. Muslims of Nepal 1993,(quote:- Some Muslim women in Kathmandu observed use Sindoor in Their wedding.
  3. https://web.archive.org/web/20190706153901/https://hindi.news18.com/news/uttar-pradesh/lucknow-shia-board-chairman-waseem-rizvi-comment-on-muslim-womens-bangles-and-sindoor-upns-2175823.html
  4. https://web.archive.org/web/20171011203127/https://www.jagran.com/delhi/new-delhi-city-ncr-no-muslim-woman-can-be-rejected-from-islam-by-filling-vermilion-16848499.html
Mr.Lazy Guy (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Do not merge

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was do not merge into Kumkum. -- DarkCrowCaw 18:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sindoor and Kumkum appear to be different things. Sindoor is very specific and has specific uses. Kumkum appears to be more general and can have several compositions and colors. It also has multiple functions unrelated to Sindoor. Maybe Sindoor can be classified as a type of Kumkum (uncertain of this - is it true?), but its cultural and religious significance warrant a distinct article. --Hunnjazal (talk) 09:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Title Change request

[edit]

It is Sindooram not Sindoor. Sindoor is the Hindi derivative of the original, pan-Indian word Sindooram. Can someone please change? 108.244.138.234 (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ingredients

[edit]

Seems there's a great deal of confusion on what it is made of today. I cannot find what source verifies Bixa orellana, there's no mention of turmuric in the lede, and we should probably remove any mention of "tradition" without sourcing from references that provide dates and history. --Ronz (talk) 19:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Difference from Kumkuma?

[edit]

Currently (as has been the case for years), this article states that kumkuma is "another name for sindoor". If, as Hunnjazal supposes above, Sindoor and Kumkum are "different things", then this article should instead explain the difference. Sebastian 13:53, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply