Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Simon de Langres is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In regards to the events in the last sentence of this article, what did Simon de Langres have to do with these events? That is, were they merely contemporary events, or was he in some specific way connected to them, or responsible for them? If he was, how so?
The citation that is given seems to suggest his tenure as Master was 1362-1369. Why is there a disconnect between the source and the dates here? Where is a definitive listing for dates of various Masters? Why is the WP list of names / dates uncited?
The citation source that is given for this article seems to suggest, in a vague non-finger-pointing way, that the major characteristic of this Master was that although of generous heart, and driven by an ardent desire to bring finances of the Order into better condition, his plans ran into various obstacles that were too great, and alludes to a criticism that he may not have availed himself of the all proper procedures that were available. Is that a fair characterization of his tenure? Where are proper sources that address these issues?
Does this article presently really meet verifiable standards? How do we know that any of this is correct, and where is an encyclopedic assessment of the relevant impact of his tenure?
