Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a3fee5eedac8d806

Jump to content

Talk:Simon Ostrovsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Simon Ostrovsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Undue revert - Simon Ostrovsky is a former Israeli and reports extensively about Israeli topics

[edit]

An extensive edit that I wrote was reverted without discussion or explanation.
This is not acceptable conduct.

First I wish to discuss the validity of what I wrote:

He is considered Israeli by Israeli and foreign media outlets, and in fact, he IS a former Israeli. This is not just about citizenship but also about apperciation of the culture and knowledge of intricate Israeli internal politics, showing that he is NOT an armchair journalist, but rather a well-versed person with a good background about the area he's making a video about.

I brought good resources for everything I wrote. Pointing to his reports on youtube - the videos are all from the Vice channel itself, so no copyright or other problems. Is anybody contesting the description of the videos' content?

There are exactly two sentences at the beginning which are not sourced, but which are clearly shown in the rest of the article, and which I can easily show is correct with sources. I'm sure he himself agrees with me on this, although, obviously, he would not agree with my view on Israeli policies and politics, but that has no bearing on what I wrote which is simply fair, NPOV and correct to say. Jabri was considered, at least by Israelis, as one of Israel's worst enemies. Here's the Daily Telegraph saying it(!): How Israel killed Jabari - its toughest enemy in Gaza.

I came to add some sources showing the discussion his videos created in both the Israeli right and left, but found it was all erased!

Here's what I wrote:

Please discuss before reverting. Especially if it's an extensive edit. Doing that will show respect to the wikipedia writers.

As a final note, the user, User:Partiya, does not have a talk page or user page, and all his/her many edits are about this particular WP entry. I did not look into them and hope this is not a puppet nor vandalism. -- פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 01:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm in agreement with your reversion to the consensus content of this article, Pashute. Most problematic is Partiya's use WP:BIASED and tabloid sources such as the Daily Mail (per this RfC). Whether or not there is merit in the content added, the sourcing and motivation is far more on the WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS side of things, and is fringe rather than mainstream. First and foremost, Wikipedia is neither the news, nor is it a venue for advocacy. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply