Talk:Simla Hadasha
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 25 July 2018
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Hebrew article on author with sources
[edit]אלכסנדר סנדר שור 2604:2000:1304:6EF3:C919:9B15:C3B2:DB96 (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 25 July 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Simla Hadasha — Amakuru (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Simla chadasha → Simla Chadasha – Book title should be capitalized. New page should also be titled in line with Hebrew transliteration conventions 2604:2000:1304:6EF3:C919:9B15:C3B2:DB96 (talk) 14:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 19:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Move to Simla Hadasha per GBooks. The "ch" for "h" transcription is not used in academic sources. "in line with Hebrew transliteration conventions" isn't so per MOS:HEBREW WP:HEBREW. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support addition of capital to proper name. The "ch" is probably best removed. Debresser (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose, pending proof, per MOS:TITLES. Most foreign languages do not follow the capitalization rules of English. I want to see overwhelming evidence that both part of the title are conventionally capitalized in Hebrew, otherwise we follow the caps. convention of the original language (even in transliteration). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:59, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hebrew doesn't have capital letters, but the transliterated titles are always according to English rules. E.g. Shulchan Aruch 66.108.26.2 (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support the caps but agnostic on the ch/h. WP:NCHEBREW § When a topic pertains primarily to a certain subset of diaspora Jewry says that "ch" should be used to transliterate Hebrew hes (ח) for topics related to the Ashkenazim. Evidence from English sources would be nice. — AjaxSmack 21:52, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.