Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a242fc33fec0d945

Jump to content

Talk:Simalia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Kiwi Rex in topic Simalia and Morelia

Simalia and Morelia

[edit]

I noticed that some species put by Reynolds et al. (2014) in genus Simalia are still said to belong in genus Morelia in their respective pages. The exceptions are Simalia amethistina and Simalia oenpelliensis. Is there a reason for this or is it just an inconsistensy? As far as I know all seven species (amethistina, boeleni, clastolepis, kinghorni, nauta, oenpelliensis, and tracyae) belong in the same genus, which is Simalia according to Barker et al. (2015), the Reptile Database, and Wikispecies, to name a few.Kiwi Rex (talk) 23:40, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply