Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2428746daf04e12

Jump to content

Talk:Sigonce

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Complete turing in topic Population stat box

File:Tour de l'Horloge - Sigonce.JPG Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Tour de l'Horloge - Sigonce.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests - No timestamp given
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:11, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Population stat box

[edit]

What's the best way to place the population box? I looked at it with just having its own section, not impeded by the body of the rest of the page, and it just leaves a huge white space that I find particularly unappealing. Where does everyone (or anyone) else land on this? I also don't know if I'm a fan of the population stats just going side by side with the rest of the body. It seems cluttered, or barren. Is this just one of those times where we pick a side? I also put it under the info box, somehow, (right alignment I think) and I didn't think it looked great and that's certainly not the standard here. (All of the viewings I"m talking about were, of course, viewed with the edit tool pre-submit.) Complete turing (talk) 18:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply