Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a254ad6deadbf49c

Jump to content

Talk:Sic bo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Mliu92 in topic Potential outcomes

Merger of Big and small into Sic bo

[edit]

There is significant overlap in the content of the two articles and, as far as I can tell from research on the Internet, 'Sic bo' is the more common term in English-speaking countries; it is the term used in the laws regulating UK casinos, for example. If the games are variants of each other, the principal differences appear to be only the range of wagers offered (and, perhaps, the odds for wagers that are common to the games). --Fibula 14:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Macau name?

[edit]

i just visited the Sands and the Wynn in Macau and both refered to it as Sic Bo and not anything else. I am not frequent macau visitor, so i'm not sure if this is common at the local casinos or not. but if someone knows they might want to correct the article. 137.189.4.1 03:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Probability Error

[edit]

The probability for Four Number Combination is given as 1.85%, which is 4/216. There are 4 ways to choose which 3 of the 4 numbers will appear, but then 3! ways to permute these numbers amongst the dice, giving 24/216 = 1/9 = 11.11%. Odds of 7 to 1 are plausible for a probability of 1/9, but not for a probability of 1.85%. Any disagreements? Jim 14159 12:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The probabilities and payouts also seem inconsistent for "Three Single Number Combination" and "Specific Double and Single Number Combination" They would result in a negative house edge. Jim 14159 02:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

WOW! What's going on here? The chart seems to suggest that U.K. and New Zealand pay 216 to 1 on a specific triple bet. Since the odds against the player hitting are 215 to 1, this means that the player has ADVANTAGE in both places. Yet the chart claims that the player gets a 16.2% disadvantage?? Where did these numbers come from? (For the house to get a 16.2% edge, they should pay out 180 to 1).

A mistake is one thing, but the error appears to have been pointed out FIVE YEARS AGO, and still hasn't been addressed?

Note that it is correctly stated that 150 to 1 payout represents 30.1% house advantage. But based on the huge flaws elsewhere in the chart, I'm not sure I can trust that such are the actual payout odds in Macau.

Should the table be entirely scrapped?zadignose (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

There are too many mistakes about the probability which misguided me.--Zzzwik (talk) 08:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Confusion on Single Dice Bet

[edit]

If there are 3 dice involved, and you select any single number 1 to 6, isn't the probability that your number shows up suppose to be 50% not 34.72%??? From my understanding there is a 1 in 6 probabilty that you will see your number on one die, so a 3 in 6 probability that you will see it on atleast one of the 3 die correct? 34.72% works out to a ratio of 217/625, how can this be?

No that is not correct, one can't just add probabilities from three 1:6 tries to arrive at 50%. Take two coins for example. Thrown simultaneously, the possibilities are {T,T} {T,H} {H,T} and {H,H}. So the probability that any one of the coins will be heads is 3/4 not (1/2 + 1/2). The probability that just one (and only one) of them is heads is 2/4.
Single Dice Bet for one die means a specific number will appear on one (and only one) die. This probability is 3*(1/6)^1*(5/6)^2 = 75/216 = 34.72% (see http://wizardofodds.com/sicbo/appendix.html). Probability of a specific number on one or more dice is (36+5*11)/216 = 91/216 = 42.13%. AdeBarkah (talk) 21:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Very common misconception which I've seen books from a century ago trying to dispossess people of in regards to Chuck-a-Luck. I could quote something in the article if anyone thinks it's worth the trouble. Heather (talk) 14:04, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Craps Strategy"

[edit]

The section of the article that says "Sic bo is strictly a game of chance because every roll on the dice results a win or loss on any bet. In craps, some bets require certain rolls before they can become winning or losing bets, thus encouraging strategy." gave me pause. Craps is still a game of pure chance and has a negative (or zero, on Odds bets) expected value on every bet. There is no "strategy" to maximize returns or beat the game, all you can have are different ways of betting.  Preceding unsigned comment added by GothPigeon (talkcontribs) 02:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Potential outcomes

[edit]

Strictly for edification:

123S
3tp
4p
5p
6p
7p
8p
123S
4p
5p
6
7
8
9
123S
5p
6
7p
8
9
10
123S
6p
7
8
9p
10
11
123S
7p
8
9
10
11p
12
123S
8p
9
10
11
12
13p

123S
4p
5p
6
7
8
9
123S
5p
6tp
7p
8p
9p
10p
123S
6
7p
8p
9
10
11
123S
7
8p
9
10p
11
12
123S
8
9p
10
11
12p
13
123S
9
10p
11
12
13
14p

123S
5p
6
7p
8
9
10
123S
6
7p
8p
9
10
11
123S
7p
8p
9tp
10p
11p
12p
123S
8
9
10p
11p
12
13
123S
9
10
11p
12
13p
14
123S
10
11
12p
13
14
15p

123S
6p
7
8
9p
10
11
123S
7
8p
9
10p
11
12
123S
8
9
10p
11p
12
13
123S
9p
10p
11p
12tp
13p
14p
123S
10
11
12
13p
14p
15
123S
11
12
13
14p
15
16p

123S
7p
8
9
10
11p
12
123S
8
9p
10
11
12p
13
123S
9
10
11p
12
13p
14
123S
10
11
12
13tp
14p
15
123S
11p
12p
13p
13p
15tp
16p
123S
12
13
14
15
16p
17p

123S
8p
9
10
11
12
13p
123S
9
10p
11
12
13
14p
123S
10
11
12p
13
14
15
123S
11
12
13
14p
15
16p
123S
12
13
14
15
16p
17p
123S
13p
14p
15p
16p
17p
18tp

In each 'group' of 36 outcomes:

  • There is one triple
  • There are 16 pairs (+ the triple, which can be counted as a pair)
  • There are 11 'native' pairs (i.e., 1-1 pairings in the '1' group)

Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 03:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply