Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22fb3da6abf5645

Jump to content

Talk:Sial

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Bejnar in topic Pronunciation?

Move to Wiktionary ?

[edit]

I don't feel competent to add here in English, but this for sure is a potential encyclopedic entry. Gdabski 14:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC) [in response to RussBlau's edit of 18:21, 26 September 2005]Reply

Class=Start

[edit]

This is an historical article as much as anything. It has a good lead, a picture, and subdivisions. I'd say that was more than just a stub. --Bejnar 02:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree, but then, I think, we should remove geology-stub. Solarapex 03:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge into "continental crust"?

[edit]

The word "sial" seems to be merely an alternative name for continental crust, not a different concept. I propose to merge the articles, if nobody objects. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose Geochemists understand/understood sial differently than just part of the earth's crust. The sial article is about chemical composition and magmatic differentiation, while the continental crust article is about rocks, deformation, seas and plate tectonics. The article is short, but supports a number of links from articles that are really independent from the continental crust. In re-reading the continental crust article, it did not seem that sial would make a very useful subsection. The not-altogether-accurate brief mention of sial in the lead paragraph really is the only connection. The two articles represent two different ways of looking at essentially (but not necessarily) the same physical area. --Bejnar (talk) 06:28, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation?

[edit]

is it Sigh-All or Si'ale or See-all or Sih'ahl? OsamaBinLogin (talk) 19:52, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I would assume the last as it derives from silica and aluminium, no ref for that, jes' my understanding (common sense :-) Vsmith (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Or maybe as in sialic acid, see , although that's a different usage. Vsmith (talk) 20:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
In American English it is Sigh-al with the accent on the first syllable and a soft schwa for the a in al. I wrote Sigh to show that the i was long, as in "might" or "like". --Bejnar (talk) 20:43, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply