Talk:SiFive
Add topic | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 October 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Contesting speedy deletion
[edit]Please comment at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SiFive.
Someone tagged the article for possible speedy deletion. I don't think the article meets the stated criteria for deletion, which were that "in its current form it serves only to promote or publicise an entity, person, product, or idea, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic".
The article is encyclopedic in tone and approach, with references for every paragraph. It cites AnandTech and VentureBeat, which are both well-known and widely respected in their fields, plus some specialized news websites I am not familiar with. So I don't think the "fundamental rewrite" clause applies.
The article currently does not seem at all promotional to me. It does, of course, provide some publicity for SiFive, but that reflects the interest shown by AnandTech and VentureBeat. So I don't think the "serves only" clause applies.
Therefore I recommend retaining this article, at least for the foreseeable future. Cheers — CWC 00:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
"Growth" and "History"
[edit]It feels like these should be just one section, really. Growth as its own section feels odd especially, given that companies will also shrink (see recent layoffs and restructuring). Reil (talk) 16:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with Reil. Company's regularly experience growth and size reductions. For the most part, these fluctuations are not newsworthy and, even when they are, it seems most appropriate to discuss growth history under a single history section. 174.172.195.106 (talk) 12:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)