Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
Shtime is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities
On 27 February 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Shtime to Shtime. The result of the discussion was moved.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@Sadko, regarding the removal of Jusuf Osmani’s Kolonizimi Serb i Kosovës - the justification that he's "an archivist and not a historian" doesn't hold up under WP:RS. Osmani holds a PhD in archival science, directed the State Archives of Kosovo, and is widely cited for his work on colonization and demographic history in the region. His research is grounded in primary archival sources and published by reputable institutions. Furthermore, the edition in question features an introduction by Noel Malcolm, a highly respected scholar of Balkan history who reviewed the book. This is a clear non-biased endorsement of the work’s academic merit. An editor with years of experience such as yourself should recognize that this easily qualifies as a reliable source per Wikipedia standards, and its removal lacks a basis in Wiki policy. Botushali (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yes, as I mentioned, he's not a historian. His academic work has been cited very little, and the organization he works for has a short history with limited scholarly output. I’ve verified all of this. It's quite debatable whether this qualifies as RS. — Sadko(words are wind)18:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
