Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2351dee3816addf

Jump to content

Talk:Shrinking space

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kphoek in topic Metacompact and normal is Shrinking?

As far as I know in no common textbook on topology the term "shrinking space" is in use. Conversely, the theory of locally convex spaces uses this term in connection with spaces of a specific type. Read more: H. Jarchow , "Locally convex spaces" , Teubner (1981) Schojoha (talk) 17:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Metacompact and normal is Shrinking?

[edit]

"Thus, every normal metacompact space is a shrinking space. In particular, every paracompact space is a shrinking space." I am not sure whether these two statements are correct. As for the second statement, a paracompact space need not be normal (paracompact does not include the Hausdorff-property in Wikipedia!). If one adds the Hausdorff-property (or more generally the preregularity), this becomes true. EDIT: The first statement is now clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.225.129.103 (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree, the claim that "every paracompact space is a shrinking space" is wrong as per the definition of paracompactness on Wikipedia. (The correct hypothesis should be "paracompact Hausdorff space", see e.g. Lemma 41.6 of Munkres' Topology.) Kphoek (talk) 18:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply