Talk:Shringasaurus

Needs a lot more content

Right now the page is just "this is an azendohsaurid from India" and we need more than this. Any mention of its unique horns? No? Just a brief mention of its time period and location? Okay then. Wikkler (talk) 03:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Not everyone has the time to write a fully-fledged article, and certainly not everyone has the interest to write about non-archosaurian archosauromorphs. While quality articles are desirable, Wikipedia editors do not have a mandatory obligation to cater to individual opinions on what articles should and should not be expanded as a priority. What of the taxa which are months, years, and even decades old but have not yet received sufficient coverage? Is it really fair to neglect all of them in favour of some new, shiny, and glorified taxon? If you really want a good article for this taxon that badly, it is your responsibility to make the article instead of complaining about it. It's not like this article is protected anyway. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 04:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)