Talk:Shool
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Toddy1 in topic Reception section
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Reception section
[edit]Comparing the reception sections of the two rival versions of Sid95Q and Ustadeditor2011 it seems to me that Sid95Q's version is better.
Sid95Q's reception section contains both critical response and accolades. These correspond to the reception and awards sections of Ustadeditor2011's version.
- The difference between Sid95Q's critical response and Ustadeditor2011's reception section is that Ustadeditor2011 deleted one of the reviews without explanation.
- Sid95Q's accolades section is a neat table with citations (making it verifiable), whereas Ustadeditor2011's awards section lacks citations and has a worse format.
Unless anyone can give sensible reasons for preferring Ustadeditor2011's critical response and accolades sections I will revert that part of the article to Sid95Q's version.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Since nobody objected, I have done that. -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Bihar articles
- Low-importance Bihar articles
- Start-Class Bihar articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Bihar articles
- Start-Class Indian cinema articles
- Low-importance Indian cinema articles
- Start-Class Indian cinema articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class film articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles