Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28183287af6eddd

Jump to content

Talk:Shivraj Singh Chouhan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do not discuss apart WP:TPG

[edit]

Please avoid to put information on talk pages or anywhere on Wikipedia, that is unacceptable and falls under

for more awareness about how to behave at talk pages, please go for WP:TPG --Dr.pragmatist (talk) 07:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add controversial section

[edit]

Please, add a controversial section in which irregularities of illegal mining dumper scam and other allegation which are under investigation are mentioned. --Prabhatbaghel (talk) 11:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 Done As of now important controversies have been mentioned by some user. But do not expect to add news materials. Thanks--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  15:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Remove controversial section

[edit]

Digvijay singh is a leader of rival party and his accusation do not form the basis of any indulgence of shivraj singh chouhan involvment in scam . The matter is in court and he is not even accused nor found guilty . Then why this section is involved in his personal biography ? Criticizing state government does not means the person is involved in wrong doings .Why then accusations are used as basis for adding a section ? there is a leader called [Arvind kejriwal] several accusations have been put by his fellow members but no controversy section is included on that page .malign anybody name just because some political rival has accused is not good sign of quality articles .They look good on news site but wikipedia is not a new website .  Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.38.200.66 (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi! It's not about Digvijaya Singh but the fact has been stated. Request you to please refrain from removing the content as all of it is properly referenced. You can post on the Talk page first and let other editors decide on it.Katyaan (talk) 05:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi did any official facts accuse him of corruption ? If not why these are put here ? all reference material is accusation .If accusation form basis of content then why various leaders pages are refrained from it ?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.38.200.66 (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Reply
None of them is accusation but all these issues are under investigation. Further, you are free to add the content if you feel the whole truth has not been out there. E.g. in first paragraph under corruption charges, it has been mentioned that he and his wife were accused but later court gave them the clean chit. Katyaan (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Shivraj Singh Chouhan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Scams

[edit]

How come Vyapam scam has no mention under political career of this BOP?-25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 13:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply