Talk:Shish Gumbad
Add topic | Shish Gumbad was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 25, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lead picture
[edit]Abhishek.rai777 attempted to insert this photo as the lead picture on this article. Apart from leaving messages on user talkpage, I have explained in detail here. Kindly discuss the change in lead picture here to avoid any 3RR. Thanks, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Differences
[edit]What are the visual differences between the Shisha Gumbad and the Bara Gumbad? Am I right in saying the Shisha has a flat top and the dome is more round less steep, and shallower (more hemispherical) than the Bara. The sides of the Bara's dome are steeper (more oval) and the very top is not flat but has a broken stub rising out of it? The Shisha stands alone and the Bara has adjoining buildings. The Shisha still has some tiles on it, and the Bara does not. What differences inside? BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class Delhi articles
- Mid-importance Delhi articles
- B-Class Delhi articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Delhi articles
- B-Class Indian history articles
- Mid-importance Indian history articles
- B-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles