Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22249296fc2cf79

Jump to content

Talk:Shingeki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Asbenn. Peer reviewers: Pawilsong, Jring333.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is

[edit]

a somewhat dubious, completely unreferenced account of shingeki. It needs to be totally reworked.--Michitaro (talk) 13:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Hello

[edit]

so I'm currently working on this article. So far, I added information I collected about the history of shingeki and got rid of the old history section, which seemed dubious as said above. I'm far from finished. I wish to add a section on the Red Purge and how that affected Shingeki. As well as find more information about it wile WWII was going on, and maybe a section on post-shingeki, or at least how we got to post-shingeki Asbenn (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

[edit]

The article is clear and seems be comprehensive. The content of the article is relevant and does not represent a biased perspective. From what has been published, I see no viewpoint as under or overrepresented. There is credible sourcing linked to the article and it looks to be properly sourced at each claim. If anything, the author should add more information about Shingeki. The article is crafted in a way that would spark your interest and provide cross reference to multiple articles which increases the credibility of the article. This is strong foundation to build off of. The history section provides great context and the section on war gives us a sense of the inherent influence of the art form. Pawilsong (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply