Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Latest comment: 2 months ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Hii, @Flyingphoenixchips, Could you extend your reason(s) for rejection apart from standard templates? As far as my experience is concerned, I am fully aware of notability criteria and many of mine passed easily. This article too, in my view, passes WP:AUTHOR or WP:ANYBIO. I don't understand what is stopping it. All 4 are secondary reliable sources. What did you find on the page that made you place an LLM template on it? I hope it is not a sign of carelessness from your side. Honestly speaking, my earlier thought was that I should have moved the page directly to the article mainspace because I was sure about its notability. I still prefer to go through the review process, but here it seems others have judged it too quickly. Callmehelper (talk) 02:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Draft:Muktabai Salve this one too rejected by you with an essay template. I don't understand what stopping any reviewer to write some line about what they feel and how it could be improve so that it can pass notability or pass as stub. Callmehelper (talk) 02:53, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The way references are formatted made me suspect that it is LLM generated, because the way wikitext is formatted gives a lot of signs of AI use. Leaving that aside, I am not contesting notability. Please improve the pages as per the Wikipedia style guide, and resubmit. I shall approve the same Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 03:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Flyingphoenixchips, since now you know that references are formatted in a very standard way ( WP:SHORTCITE ), I expect you to accept article as they are once I resubmit. Also, as you thankfully agree that there's no problem of notability per se, along with no LLM issue. Apart from this, I must acknowledge the fact that these figures have very limited information - neither have exact birth/death dates nor have done vast amount of works. What makes them notable is that they were early figures who started such movement of writings and that's why scholars still study them. So we can't expand these articles in the form of GA type sections from 'early life to legacy'. There is nothing more to add here. Let me know what you think. Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 11:05, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
