Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2432a959d1a1ef0

Jump to content

Talk:Shaul Gordon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by MelanieN in topic Warning

Warning

[edit]

To the editor deleting RS supported text, as here -- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shaul_Gordon&diff=1098600036&oldid=1098597577

Please stop it. Take this as a warning. 2603:7000:2143:8500:A0E3:1DE9:D889:BF35 (talk) 00:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi User talk:GiantSnowman. An editor who I see you have had a conversation with has repeatedly, just again now here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shaul_Gordon&diff=1098694642&oldid=1098674535), deleted perfectly proper and supported and non-copyvio text along with refs. I tried to communicate here. He claims copyright .. and then deletes proper material like "won competition x, earned a silver medal in competition y, attended school z, eared a degree in school a" - and I can't even show you what the material was because it was hidden (maybe you can see it?). It obviously is not copyvio. My trying to communicate with him and address his concern only led to more of this from him. It only led to more deleting. I don't want to simply go back and forth with him. He clearly has no good reason for this. And he seems very experienced, so that does not seem to be the problem. Can you help? Thanks. --2603:7000:2143:8500:C04F:3A57:16F5:9C37 (talk) 04:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have explained to this user, on my talk page, why intervening versions of the article had to be deleted and hidden, as long as there was still copyrighted material in the article. This meant that several dozen edits had to be reverted and hidden - namely, all the edits made between when the problem material was put in the article and when it was deleted. The intervening edits may not have been copyvio in themselves, but they were on a page that contained copyvio material, and so they had to be reverted. -- MelanieN (talk) 21:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply