Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a221a6b8bb8f3401

Jump to content

Talk:Shared reading

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 19 years ago by Elomis in topic Fixed, kinda

This page will be a very well written page. I will finish it in the next day. Shared Reading is one piece of balanced literacy and should be left on Wikipedia. It will contain original research and once complete we can determine if it should stay or not. Thanks

I am in the process of writting this proposal for a site. It is a valid piece of balanced lieteracy and once complete I feel will be a viable site. Once done we can determine if it should be deleted.

Original Research

[edit]

Hi there, Wikipedia has a strict policy that orginal research is not suitable under any circumstances. If you'd like any further clarification drop a line on my talk page. •Elomis• 04:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please let me know if you have any concerns with this page at present. Thanks

Fixed, kinda

[edit]

Ok, that's an encyclopedia article now. I've removed the db tag. It's butchered pretty heavily, it contains most of the what section (which is highly relevant for an encyclopdeia) but not much of the why part, because an encyclopedia is typically less concerned with why things exist (except for scientific articles, "why does X happen" etc.) Is there any way you can tie the citations into the article properly? They look at the moment like they support an opinion rather than stand as citations for fact. •Elomis• 20:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


I will look at it over the next few days and see what I can do. Take care.