Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2466a5418adb86e

Jump to content

Talk:Shadow noise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 202.156.11.10 in topic Regarding reverting of edit by Wiki guy752

Regarding reverting of edit by Wiki guy752

[edit]

To the best of my knowledge, lightening is correct. There is no such thing as "digital lighting". It's still lighting. Digital would only describe that the lighting is controlled digitally. This has absolutely no effect on the actual light and thus no effect on the image. If I'm not mistaken, lightening would refer to processing to increase the brightness of shadows, which increases the noise as both noise and the signal is boosted (signal to noise ratio remains the same). I'm not sure if there could be a better word than "lightening" though. Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to explain where the original noise in the shadow comes from, and I'm not sure if this could be consider a "true" noise source as it looks like its simply boosting already present noise.

Unless if there another meaning for shadow noise? 202.156.11.10 (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply