Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2249ffc1b928821

Jump to content

Talk:Sexual system

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by CycoMa in topic Structure of article

Animals versus plants

[edit]

Among animal species, the sexual system is the distribution of the types of (haploid) gametes produced by (diploid) individuals. (With exceptions such as the haploid males in Hymenoptera.)

Plants have an alternation of generations, where a diploid sporophyte generation produces spores which give rise to haploid gametophytes which produce haploid gametes. Among vascular plants, where the sporophyte generation is dominant, the sexual system is the distribution of the types of gametophytes produced. Within flowering plants, the classification is elaborated to the distribution of the types of flowers producing different sets of types of gametophytes. The same probably applies to gymnosperms, but hermaphrodite strobili seem to be rare (but a web search reports their presence in Ephedra and Fitzroya) and most gymnosperms are monoecious (e.g. Pinus) or dioecious (e.g. Gingko.) Possibly this definition of sexual system applies to all seed plants, including the extinct classes.

I don't know offhand how the term is applied to the gametophyte dominant bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, and hornworts), but I recall seeing references to dioecious mosses, so I can infer that the concept is applied.

The concept of sexual system is presumably not applicable to prokaryotes, and less certainly to isogamous eukaryotes. That leaves various additional groups where the concept is used - such as green algae (a recent report seems to identify a volvocid species are trioecious, though dioecy is the norm), brown algae and fungi. Lavateraguy (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Linnaeus

[edit]

A different sense of sexual system is Linnaeus' artificial classification scheme for plants, based on the numbers of stamens and carpels in flowers. That might be worth an article, with a hatnote here, if it doesn't already have one. Lavateraguy (talk) 09:44, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Structure of article

[edit]

I think that it should be possible to structure the article better than alphabetically. Perhaps a split between animals and gametophyte-dominant plants on the one hand, and sporophyte-dominant plants on the other. Lavateraguy (talk) 09:47, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Another possibility is
  • all individuals hermaphrodite - synoecy, monoecy, trimonoecy, simultaneous hermaphroditism, sequential hermaphoditism, ?paradioecy
  • no individuals hermaphrodite - dioecy/gonochorism, ?paradioecy
  • some individuals hermaphrodite - androdioecy, gynodioecy, trioecy, ...
Lavateraguy (talk) 11:44, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
A guess a split for animals and plants could work.CycoMa (talk) 21:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Source may be useful

[edit]

[This source] may be useful for this article.CycoMa (talk) 14:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sequential monoecy

[edit]

I did research on sequential monoecy but had a hard time finding a definition for it. There are reliable sources that mention it some of them are even notable so it’s worth a mention.CycoMa (talk) 07:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply