Talk:Sexercise
Add topic | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Clean-Up
[edit]- Actual clean-up - This is a large advertisement for the English sexercise website, so I am going to clean it up so that it doesn't seem that way. ~ TheSun (talk) 16:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC) ~
cleanup (2006/7)
[edit]Thanks Arru! Man, this article does need some cleaning up. I'm still not sure exactly what sexercises are supposed to be :p Seems like a vague term that could apply to just about anything, but I do like the concept. Combine the two best physical pleasures (possibly with food, I think there's an article on that too...) with each other! --Tyciol 16:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
The calorie-counts given cannot possibly be correct. 0.5 to 1 calorie/minute adds up to 770 to 1440 calories for 24 hours. In other words, the article claims that an adult male engaged in "moderate" sexual activity continously burn less calories than he does while sleeping. "vigorous" activity "may" burn "up to" 1.2 - 2 calories/minute. 1.2 calories/minute is still about equivalent to what you need while sleeping, certianly *any* "vigorous" activity will consume 10 times that.
I think this is a hoax. --RedPooka 21:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
This page needs to be deleted HARD, this shit is made up. there are zero sources . delete, delete, delete. Amirman 21:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Multiple sources ar now in the article, and a mention in the Oxford English Dictionary was cited in teh AFD debate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DESiegel (talk • contribs) 21:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)