Talk:Seven Military Classics

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

China: History

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history.

Military history: Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Quote from Kangxi

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are a few problems with this quote. First, the fact that it is in broken English makes me distrust the translation. Does anyone have the Van de Ven book referenced here that can check on it? Secondly, it seems to be a disparaging remark on the classics, which doesn't make sense with the surrounding content in the article. If it's important, we may want to set it apart. —Zujine|talk 17:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Seven Military Classics

Quote from Kangxi