Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a242cedccf78be76

Jump to content

Talk:Service choreography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by NukeofEarl in topic Duplicate References

Merger proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to Merge. NukeofEarl (talk) 18:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

There is a lot of overlap between Service choreography and Web Service Choreography. I propose making WSC a subsection in Service choreography article. - abhi (talk) 20:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Victorwss (talk) 12:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Duplicate References

[edit]

There are 3 references listed twice in this article:
[7], [21]: Jack Vaughan: BPMN 2.0 adds notation to handle BPM choreography. SearchSOA.com

[8], [22]: Johannes Maria Zaha, Alistair P. Barros, Marlon Dumas, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede: Let's Dance: A Language for Service Behavior Modeling. OTM Conferences 2006:145-162

[9], [23]: Gero Decker, Oliver Kopp, Frank Leymann, Mathias Weske: BPEL4Chor: Extending BPEL for Modeling Choreographies. ICWS 2007:296-303

87.155.51.122 (talk) 10:53, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. But you can just perform edits yourself, you know; it's much faster that way.--NukeofEarl (talk) 15:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply