Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2257651e93e70b8

Jump to content

Talk:Sequential art

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Greenberger in topic Can we elaborate on this more?

Untitled

[edit]

Changed to a redirect as discussed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics

Reason to open this article again

[edit]

The late Will Eisner, author of the term, which is used in Wikipedia anyway, pointed out that Comics are not Sequential art but the printed form of it that includes text boxes, and dialog balloons.

Explaining Sequential Art in the Comics article is as senseless and confusing as explaining Literature in the Poetry article.

--20-dude (talk) 10:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

To do list

[edit]
  • Verify and eliminate or expand and source the affirmations made by previous editors.
  • Elaborate on the story of the term, and perhaps include the root words of "sequential" and "art".
  • Open a section to elaborate on the different types of sequential art, including comics.

Anything else?

--20-dude (talk) 10:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

the trick

[edit]

Ok, there's the trick: the "Sequential art" article has to summarize all the work done in various mediums and the "comics" article, in contrats, only has to mention that it's an evolution that came and belong to the sequential art.

Sequential sculpture

[edit]

Hi, regarding sequential sculpture, Bryan Talbot mentions Craig Knowles (artist)' Taking Flight (Alice in Sunderland, p. 105). . There are other sequential sculptures, such as Zenos Frudakis' Freedom (2001, GlaxoSmithKline World Headquarters, Philadelphia) or Dion Wright's Evolution of Birds (Arizona/Sonora Desert Museum in Tucson) . Should that be mentioned here? And does anybody know of more instances? --Jonas kork (talk) 07:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Images

[edit]

I thought about the images used for the article. Considering that the criterion is that the art should consist of a cohesive sequence, it isn't particularly illustrative that all illustrations are of single image, and that Will Eisner drawing seems to be cover art, thus not really sequential to begin with. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 15:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Can we elaborate on this more?

[edit]

This entry is pretty limited in scope to something Will Eisner said. In truth, sequential art has been around since the early days of people drawing things on cave walls. Certainly, the frescoes we see all over Italy are nothing if not sequential art. Giotto's Scrovegni Chapel is one giant comic book, basically- and deserves to be mentioned, as is the Egyptian Book of the Dead. This page deserves a much more expansive scholarly dig into what is basically the precursor to modern cinema, really, which is nothing but a collection of sequential images. Greenberger (talk) 13:45, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply