Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a251da2d3a68a140

Jump to content

Talk:Septentrio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Asimsky in topic Missing disambiguation page!

Missing disambiguation page!

[edit]

I found the word "Septentrio" as an apparent synonym for "North" on a 16th century map and went to Wikipedia to learn more about the meaning and etymology of the word. The lemma however describes a very much 21st century product, in fact the entry IMO looks more like an advertisement for the eponymous company than an encyclopedia article. Am I naive to think such usurpation of entries to describe trademarks rather than general meanings are against Wikipedia rules? At the very least they are disturbing for the user - the oldest, and from today's viewpoint probably most obscure, meaning should always turn up FIRST in an encyclopedia, as all others would be derived from it. And the commercial company "Septentrio" does have a homepage of their own, easily googled, while the word in its original sense certainly has not. -- ChrisZ78 (talk) 15:39, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

IMHO, septentrio means North in Latin, so it could belong to the Latin wikipedia. In English it is called North and such an article exists of course. I don't see a reason to redirect septentrio to North; there are tons of Latin words which still have some currency in stylized texts, but noone sees them as English words. Just to mention, this word still belongs to the French vocabulary, but as 'septentrion'. Maybe we could address the issue by changing the name of this lemma to Septentrio N.V.--Asimsky (talk) 10:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply